Reading Bernoulli's fallacy
I have started reading Bernoull's fallacy by Aubrey Clayton.
It has some very nice ideas about bayesian and frequentists statistics, but so far I think that the philosophy behind bayesian statistics is much better explained in Scientific reasoning Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach by Colin Howson. Moreover, I think it really overstates the benefit that ditching frequentist statistics would do to science. In my opinion the scientific enterprise is something much more complex than just statistic reasoning. For instance, in genetics we use statistics, but the role of this kind of inference is somewhat secondary.